Assignment
Personal objectives
Before using the lasercut is a very good idea to test the parameters in order to understand the changes and the possibles
outcomes when a laser cut machine. For this purpose I try first the engraving parameters first with a set of fixed speed and precision,
and then varying the power of the laser.
The speed is set in mm/min, the precision of the engraving in dpi, and the power is measure in percentage of the maximum laser power.
The tests was made in MDF of 3 mm thickness with the next parameters:
Speed | Precision | Power | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6000 mm/min | 200 dpi | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
300 dpi | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | |
7000 mm/min | 200 dpi | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
300 dpi | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
Results
In a similar way the parameters for cutting were tested. The parameters
to try this time were speed (mm/min) and power (%). First and the power were fixed a 85 % and the speed were tested in a range of 900 to 3000 mm/min.
It was found that with a power of 85% the speed could be up to 2600 mm/min. However after 2000 mm/min,
is necessary to push the cut in order to remove. That’s why I chose a 2000 mm/min speed for the varying power test. (Fig. 5)
With a fix speed of 2000 mm/min the power were tested from 50% to 85% and it was found that even a 55 % power the cut is clean, but again at 55%
it was necessary a push to remove the cut piece.
As a conclusion the parameters to cut 3mm thickness MDF are: power: 60% and speed: 2000 mm/min.
For a press fit model is necessary to test the joints between the different parts. That’s why I made a test consisting in a test different joins with a reduction in percentage of the thickness of the MDF. First I use a reduction from 100% to 75 % in steps of -5% at a time. This was clearly an exaggeration because at 95% reduction the fit was to tight. That’s why a second test was made between 100% and 95% with steps of 1%. With this test it was found that a reduction of 4 % in the thickness for joints is a good point for a press-fit model. Gives the possibility to assemble and disassemble the model without compromise the integrity of the pieces.
First, I wanted to try a simple model, just to understand the concept of press-fit model. That´s why I designed a sphere with a central piece (Figure 9) and a lateral piece (Figure 10). The lateral piece will be repeated 8 times (Figure 11).
After the first test, I wanted to create something that builds in different forms. Then I created a parametric model in SolidWorks that depends of the thickness of the material, in this case I used cardboard with 2.85 mm thickness; and the press-factor found in the first test (96%). In Figure 15 there are some of the circles cut and in Figure 16 and 17 some of the structures that I made with them.
The vinyl cutter available here is a GCC Puma III Vinyl Cutter 52” ( datasheet ). Some of the specifications of this vinyl cutter are:
Operation method: Roller-type | Cutting Force: 400 g |
Maximum Cutting Width: 1300 mm | Maximum Cutting Speed (Diagonal): Up to 600 mm/sec |
Maximum Media Loading Width: 1470 mm | Offset: 0-1.0mm (with 0.025 mm increase) |
Acceptable material thickness: 0.8 mm | Mechanical resolution: 0.009 mm |
Interfaces: USB 1.1; Parallel; Serial | Dimensions: 41.93" x 64.25" x 24.41" |
To test the vinyl cutter I want to use some of the 8-bit characters from the classic Super Mario Bros (Figure 19). The image was downloaded and for the preparation of the image I uses CorelDraw X8 Graphics suite following the next steps:
With the .plt files the vinyl cutting was made and paste it over a carton with the star shape. This shape was cut with the laser using the same file with the black contour but exported as .DXF.
Files
In this section the files generated during the development of the assignment will be available to download
Test_width | Sphere_Part_1 | Sphere_Part_2 | Sphere | Circle | >Star_1 | Star_2 | Star_1 |